|
This volatile
economy brings out the meanest of management strategies in order
to maintain profitability. Cutting expenses and staff here and there,
de-equitizing partners, and scaling back starting salaries are some
of the typical bromides.
There are two
problems to this approach: (1) it is not fun - in fact, the costs
of turnover in such negatively charged work places undercuts profitability
gains from expense cutting; and (2) cutting expenses does nothing
to alter and ameliorate the behavior of partners or the structure
of the firm for the long term. Once the crisis is past, the deck
chairs go back to their original positions and the players relax
into customary poses.
While expense
management is absolutely necessary in all sorts of economic seasons,
the professional services industry has failed to embrace many of
the cost efficient revenue production strategies that their commercial
peers have used to boost revenues while controlling costs, thereby
supporting gross profitability.
In an industry
sector of smart folks, why has the adoption of select revenue production
strategies not happened? A few offerings might be that revenue production
smacks (some would say "smells") of sales; professionals
just do not do that. Or, the long lived chimera that "professionals"
get fees (revenues) by doing good work, not by marketing, thereby
maintaining the specious and antithetical relationship between the
two - professionalism and marketing.
Four strategies
that can help with this dilemma are based on cost efficient revenue
production. Plainly stated the operating principle that makes revenue
production management work is this: Cost reduction has a floor,
below which the work product quality or the organization itself
is sacrificed. Revenue production, on the other hand, has no ceiling.
One might validly argue that revenue growth drives up costs and
that a firm may grow too quickly and in doing so, lose its essence
or even its existence. But, the more balanced view, I believe, is
that carefully orchestrated revenue growth can and should enhance
revenues while containing costs. Here are four strategies and examples:
1. Managing
Partners: think of your firm as a baseball team.
In the game of revenue production in professional firms, the heavy
hitters, who are usually too few in number, do not get up to bat
as often as they should. In small to mid-sized firms the hitters
do not have enough time to step up to the plate because they are
too busy. The top batter may even be the managing partner. With
too few hitters, moreover, this leverage risks the firm's well being,
should the homerun specialist become injured, disaffected, or retired.
Management Strategy:
If you want your best rainmakers to produce more, you must deal
with the finiteness of time. Three options, among others, are to
reduce the mechanical tasks your producers do; what do they have
on their plate that can be shifted to another less busy professional?
Second, increase the high quality 'at bats' in total number and/or
upgrade the selections. For example, if your best rainmaker has
been successful as a speaker to local or regional groups, it may
now be time to make the venue a national or international one; or,
have her or him evolve from speaker to expert commentator in the
media.
One firm, Zetlin
& De Chiara, LLP in Manhattan, benefitted when founders Michael
Zetlin and Michael De Chiara hired a managing partner, Patricia
Harris. Ms. Harris also has an MBA, and she handles operations and
finance while the partners make rain. Their firm does litigation
and transactional work for the construction, design and real estate
industries nationwide. As Ms. Harris stated, "The partners
asked me to run the business so that they can focus on the practice
- catering to our clients and showing up wherever they need us and
delivering a high end, high quality product. With our thoughtful
division of labor, the lawyers can focus on producing excellent
work."
What else should
managing partners cede to competent business managers? Kenneth A.
Bailey, a CPA and the executive director of the law firm of Bressler,Amery
& Ross in Florham Park, N.J., said, "Human resources, facilities,
technology and most financials can be safely delegated. But, many
managing partners need to be coached into delegating if that has
not been part of their working experience, as it is in the business
world."
2. Deploy the
Bench: younger partners and senior associates can do many of the
marketing tasks the rainmakers have been doing.
To develop talent, you have to get the bench onto the field in a
real game. This is not risky business if you have trained and coached
them, and it frees the usual heavy hitters to go on to new, more
sophisticated marketing efforts.
Recently, one
firm had senior associates give their annual seminar for business
owners, covering intellectual property, UCC issues, negotiating
commercial real estate leases, getting financing from a bank and
employment law. They rehearsed a lot (which senior people did not
do, citing time constraints), reached out by phone to friends and
contacts to encourage attendance, and ended up with standing room
only and raves from a very sophisticated audience.
Management Strategy:
Associates and laterals desire training and a position on the business
development team, but unless you make room for them, and coach (not
train) them, they will not usually be invited to play. Make using
the next generation in critical marketing tasks an articulated and
agreed upon goal among the partnership. Inclusion retains key players,
reducing turnover costs, and an experienced next generation is the
most important facet of your business succession plan.
Significantly,
having more offensive players allows you to deleverage the contributions
of your small coterie of rainmakers. More hitters, more revenues,
and less feeling like a hostage for managing partners.
3. Make 'house
calls' on your best clients and prospects.
Commercial professionals have used the client visit, or house call,
as an integral part of their key client programs to build revenues
and profits very efficiently by enlarging the share of the client's
potential business. Increasing client or account shares is a very
reliable means of improving your firm's financial health. When you
add revenues from existing clients the price tag is six times less
expensive than acquiring a new client. As a result, small gains
in account/client share can directly affect the financial performance
of a firm on both the revenue line and the gross profit line. Moreover,
substantial improvements are quickly acquired so there are salutary
effects to cash flow as well.
Management Strategy:
When you make house calls, you see how the client makes money and
where you can add value; you get to meet other players who may run
departments that can generate new matters, or pay your invoices
(always meet them).
Joseph Basralian,
managing partner of Winne, Banta, Rizzi, Hetherington & Basralian,
PC, a law firm in Hackensack, N.J., likened house calls to tending
one's garden. "If you don't tend your own garden, nothing grows.
The more house calls, the more business you get." Mr. Basralian
visits with "sometimes" clients, those who are not paying
their bills, and good clients who, "may think we take them
for granted. Every time we visit a client, we soon thereafter get
new work."
Mark Ellis,
a CPA and chief financial officer of Michael C. Fina, a New York
retailer and supplier of employee recognition programs for major
corporations, reported that executives at his firm actually use
an evaluation form when they visit customers, which happens regularly.
There are two big benefits derived from customer visits: "We
get to see and fix problems that are usually small, but annoying
to the client, and our executives report back positive results,
which is great for employee morale. That's important, give the recognition
focus of our business."
4. Run the first
part of each partners' meeting as a sales meeting; invite associates
to attend that part.
Many professionals have never participated in a sales meeting in
their work lives. If you have not, the meeting agenda covers some
issues that are equally important in every professional service
firm: new clients, new matters from existing clients, defecting
clients, marketing activities, and business development planning.
Rainmakers receive kudos, non-producers receive the collective public
scrutiny of their colleagues, and the manager (read, managing partner)
gets to build a financial forecast.
Management Strategy:
"Partnership" imputes teamwork that is often absent from
real working relationships in professional service firms. Compensation
schemes, history, and/or philosophy may mitigate against team actions
such as public accountability for the firm's growth. Moreover, the
younger players rarely are witness to, or participants in, this
most critical management meeting - the partners' meeting.
Managing partners
should consider devoting the first 45 minutes of a partners' meeting
to a recitation of the marketing efforts, results, and plans for
the last 30 days and upcoming month. By pooling the collective intelligence
of your team and focusing it on marketing, per se, you can derive
a revenue forecast, cross fertilize contacts, and include non-partners
in appropriate upcoming activities. The public setting raises expectations
for all involved, and in doing so, can make the managing partner's
job easier and more civil. As one managing partner said, "I've
counseled, coached, browbeat and harangued my partners. Using the
sales agenda approach frees me from feeling like a hostage."
Enough said.
Instituting
this type of "sales meeting" agenda in a professional
group is politically difficult, but not impossible. Create a common
form to collect data (new clients, new matters, marketing actions
planned, and help needed) from each partner before a meeting and
then roll up the data and distribute it beforehand to save time
at the meeting and to inform the team.
The economy
may be uncertain. Your financial future does not need to be. Try
one or more of these strategies, and you will not be subject to
the slings and arrows of an uncertain fate.
© Copyright
2002, The Success Group
Return
to Article Index Page
|